RED SOUNDING: Matthews and Pence on Creationism

RED SOUNDING

Click Here for Contact Information

Back to Main Page
Quick Search

Search only in titles: Keyword:

Search in:

Date Range:

Advanced Search

Basic Search
February 2010

Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28
Monthly Archives
Feeds
Bloggers
Academia
Intelligence
Biography

I am a military historian and defense contractor. I completed a B.S. in Diplomacy and Military Studies at Hawaii Pacific University, and am continuing my education in military history by taking courses at Norwich University's online Masters Degree program. I created this blog as a scrapbook to keep a record of events I find interesting.

WHAT'S A REDSOUNDING?

A "red sounding" is a term used by sonarmen operating a fathometer. It's intended to alert the crew that the water's depth below the keel of the boat is dangerously shallow, and that the risk of running aground is imminent. It's kind of like "mark twain," but different.

I served in the US Navy from 1990-1996 as a submarine sonar technician. After completing submarine training and a further eight months of basic and advanced electronics and troubleshooting schools in Groton, CT, I was assigned to San Diego, CA, for sonar operator and repair school. With all of these schools, I spent two years of my naval service in the classroom before my first underway.

In August 1992, after finishing 2nd in my class, I was offered several choices of duty station, and chose a fast attack submarine based in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. Overall, I served on two fast attack boats: USS Aspro (SSN-648), and USS San Francisco (SSN-711). I completed submarine qualifications, and had my silver dolphins pinned on my chest in March 1993.

The Aspro was a Sturgeon-class fast attack submarine, refitted in 1986 with the AN/BQQ-5C sonar system -- the system I had spent months in San Diego learning how to operate and repair. The Aspro was commissioned in February 1969 (when I was two years old), and I served on board for her final two Western Pacific (WESTPAC) deployments -- she was decommissioned in 1995.

After Asro, I was then assigned to the USS San Francisco in November 1994, and I completed Los Angeles-class submarine qualifications in January 1995. The fact that I was already wearing dolphins made qualifying much easier than the first time.

The San Fran was an amazing boat, especially after having served the much smaller Aspro. The difference between the two classes of submarines was stark, particularly in the engine room. The limited space on Aspro -- especially in her after compartments -- was crammed full of gear, including a nuclear reactor, a propulsion plant, an electric plant, water-purification systems, several hydraulic plants, air compressors, reduction gears, sea and fresh water pumps, refrigeration plants, and numerous other life support systems. Needless to say, moving around the engine room on a Sturgeon-class boat during a fire drill while wearing a bulky oxygen breathing apparatus required great flexibility and a certain level of acrobatic skill. The forward compartments on Aspro were not much better.

The Sturgeon-class boats (except the "stretch hulls") were only 292 feet in length, compared to the LA-class's 360 feet. Also, the Sturgeons were more narrow than the LA's, and the slight difference in beam was profound from the inside. Thus, the San Fran featured an extraordinarily large engine room compared to the Aspro's.

The reason for the larger engine room was rooted in the Cold War. Hyman G. Rickover was tasked in the late 1960s with designing a very fast boat that could keep up with the speedy Soviet boats. In order to do so, the new design featured a propulsion system that really cranked out the horses. And that it did! Driving the LA-class boats proved nearly deadly during their first sea trials, as the crews struggled to tame the powerful and agile hunter/killers.

My life aboard submarines revolved mostly around my main duties as a sonar technician. During the maneuvering watch, for instance, I spent hundreds of hours operating the boat’s fathometer, standing for hours at a time in one place and staring at a stylus running back and forth, back and forth, across a roll of paper. Believe me when I say that this can challenge even the most emotionally stable of individuals.

Also, driving a $1 billion submarine into and out of port requires the undivided attention of the boat’s navigation team, which is composed of the finest watch standers who are entrusted with the safety of the crew – which consists of about 140 men – and one of the world’s most expensive and technologically sophisticated pieces of military hardware. During the maneuvering watch, thereore, it is the responsibility of the fathometer operator to alert the navigation team if he's detected anomalous water depths, which typically indicate something’s amiss. When the boat ventures into dangerously shallow water, the fathometer operator alerts the navigation team by shouting “red sounding.”

Luckily, I never encountered an actual "red sounding," a true testament to the professionalism of the officers and men I served with for 6 years in the world's finest navy.
Category Archives
Recent Comments
1. Web developers on Fighter Flying Next To Unknown Small Aircraft
  11/23/2009
2. Website Development in Surrey on Howard Dean and Newt Gingrich on MTP
  11/17/2009
3. Mike Cregge on Fort Hood Massacre
  11/7/2009
4. Philip J. Eveland on Kanye West: Mentally Retarded or Just a Racist?
  10/12/2009
5. BarnOwl on Kanye West: Mentally Retarded or Just a Racist?
  10/12/2009
6. Insurance License Exam on David Goldhill's Solution for the Health Insurance Problem
  9/16/2009
7. Womens Shoes on Kanye West: Mentally Retarded or Just a Racist?
  9/15/2009
8. Philip J Eveland on Senator Needs Civics Lesson
  9/11/2009
9. Albert Nygren on The Evidence is Growing that the Green Movement is Based on Communism
  9/11/2009
10. Michael Cregge on Senator Needs Civics Lesson
  9/10/2009

RED SOUNDING: Matthews and Pence on Creationism

Matthews and Pence on Creationism

The Left wing will strike the GOP wherever they see weakness and division. Chris Matthews questioned Mike Pence about evolution and creationism in an attempt to portray Conservatives as anti-science and stuck in the 18th century [watch]. Pence handled the questioning reasonably well, but I'm glad Matthews has tipped the Left's hand this early in the 2010 election cycle.

The GOP must be ready to respond to questions about the following hot topics:

Creation and Evolution
Stem cell research
Same-sex marriage
Lower taxes
Stronger military (including preemptive war, missile defense, and the war on terrorism)
Abortion
Prayer in school
School vouchers
Smaller government
Man-made global warming (added 5/06)

UPDATE: MSNBC host Chris Matthews asked the same question of former Representative Tom Tancredo (R-CO) [watch]. Clearly, Matthews is attempting to portray conservatives as hostile to science.

However, has anyone discussed President Obama's committment to the myth of man-made global warming? Actually, it's not called "global warming" anymore. It's been renamed "climate change" because the trend the last five years has been global cooling. What's not being reported by the establishment media is the radical plan President Obama's environmentalist advisers are considering to counter the "warming" of the earth? Ed Driscoll examined the details of the plan [watch].

Matthews' ignorance of the Creation/Evolution issue is remarkable. His proposition that only extremists believe that "there is no god; it's all, sort of, random; we all ended up here; we don't even know why we're here" indicates he's not aware of the fact that this is what is taught in every high school and college biology text book, and is the accepted framework of the established scientific community worldwide. Just visit any museum for evidence.

He also manufactures a straw man in suggesting that certain Creationists believe "a bunch of liberals...went around burying all these bones in the ground to make it look like there was ancient history." I know of no Creationists who's ever entertained such a notion, nor do I know of any Creationist who's even suggested such a conspiracy. Even noted historian Terry Mortenson, whose research of 19th Century Creationists stands as the singular and most thorough examination of the writings of these early critics of the Aristotelian (and later, Darwinian) concept of earth history, has not unearthed this ridiculous claim (in know, because I've read his Ph.D. thesis on the subject).